2. Teenagers who become mothers have grim prospects for the future. They are much more likely to leave of school; receive inadequate parental care; rely on public assistance to raise a child; develop health problems; or end up divorced.
I believe this all to be true because teen moms do not have time to be in school, usually have bad parents, must rely on public assistance to raise a child, develop health problems, and end up alone through divorce. First, teen moms cannot be in school because they must tend to the needs of their child. This then leads to the lack of education they receive which makes them unable to get good jobs to provide for their families and give them a good future. Teen moms most likely had received bad parenting which had led them to becoming moms in the first place. If they had good parenting, they would most likely know of the consequences and know that they should abstain from sex. Teen moms are not mature enough to raise children on their own. They get help from their parents and/or relatives. Their health might be affected physically depending on how many people they had sex with. Also, their health might be affected emotionally because of the process having a kid at such a young age. Lastly, teen mothers will most likely end up divorced or might not ever marry. Sometimes the father of the child does not want the responsibility of taking care of a child and a woman or he might leave because he cannot provide for both of them. The teen mom might also never get married because of the issues we talked about earlier. They might not have bright futures and could be crazy through all the stress of having a child at the age of a teenager. I mean who would want to marry an emotionally traumatic, unfit woman with no future?
Monday, March 21, 2011
Monday, March 14, 2011
Law 4
What is the difference between how the word "equality" and "justice" are used? How should we as Christians "do justice"?
The difference between equality and justice, as used in this article, is shown in the line of the last paragraph from the article, "Others argue that the call for justice and equality will always require an untempered radicalism..." They think they go hand-in-hand because equality is what they strive for and to get to that equality is through justice. They think that everybody should be given the same opportunity for everything. The justice system of our day has done just that. It has tried to give people this equal opportunity in life to do whatever they want to put their heart into. As Christians, Deuteronomy 10:19 says, "...you are to love those who are foreigners...". Jeremiah states, "Do no wrong or violence to the foreigner...". Micah 6:8 tells us "To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with [our] God". Lastly, James 1:27 says, "...to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world". Overall, we are told as Christians from the Bible to love and be nice to people we do not know and to help people are are in trouble or who are going through a hard time. This is how Christians "do justice".
The difference between equality and justice, as used in this article, is shown in the line of the last paragraph from the article, "Others argue that the call for justice and equality will always require an untempered radicalism..." They think they go hand-in-hand because equality is what they strive for and to get to that equality is through justice. They think that everybody should be given the same opportunity for everything. The justice system of our day has done just that. It has tried to give people this equal opportunity in life to do whatever they want to put their heart into. As Christians, Deuteronomy 10:19 says, "...you are to love those who are foreigners...". Jeremiah states, "Do no wrong or violence to the foreigner...". Micah 6:8 tells us "To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with [our] God". Lastly, James 1:27 says, "...to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world". Overall, we are told as Christians from the Bible to love and be nice to people we do not know and to help people are are in trouble or who are going through a hard time. This is how Christians "do justice".
Monday, February 21, 2011
Law #2
Are legal standards limited to the determination and interpretation of each individual? Why or why not?
Legal standards are not limited to the determination and interpretation of each individual because then there would be no universal understanding of what is lawful. For example, say if one person says it is wrong to steal but another thinks there is nothing wrong in stealing. Both people in this situation would be right if legal standards could be determined by each person. However, this is impossible for God makes the laws. If laws were not made by God, there would be chaos everywhere. Everyone would be able to do whatever they wanted to because they decide whether what they're doing is okay or not. To conclude, this verse is all the evidence we need as Christians to know that the Almighty God has created and given us legal standards to follow and carry out.
"You must obey my laws and be careful to follow my decrees. I am the Lord your God."
-Leviticus 18:4
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Law Posts
Sarah thinks that laws are created only by societies. Are governments the ultimate authority for creating laws?
Laws are not created by societies and governments are not the ultimate authority for creating laws. The only being in the universe that is responsible for law-making is no other than the almighty God himself. Exodus 20:1-17 (The Ten Commandments) is all the evidence we need. God has given us the Bible for moral guidance so we know what is right and what is wrong. He has also given us something much more important: the Holy Spirit and our conscience. People know it is wrong to murder and to steal. Where does this knowing come from though? God has instilled this inside all of his creation so all man knows how to obey his law. In conclusion, governments do not create the laws but rather carry them out.
Monday, February 14, 2011
Feminism
What is the Christian view of feminity or how should Christian respond to feminism? You choose which one to answer. Your response must be posted by Monday, midnight.
The Christian view of feminity is that women have a certain roles that they have been given by God. Even though the Bible says that women should not do certain things, such as being pastors, it is not being sexist or judgmental of women. It is just how God intended life to be. God has made men and women equally and loves them equally. He does not favor one over the other. Women should not try and do the roles of men because it is not what God wants from us. He wants us to follow His plan that he has made for all of us. In conclusion, women should not worry about filling the roles of men. They should focus on the roles God has laid out for them and has told them from the Bible.
Sunday, February 6, 2011
Sexist? Homophobic?
One of the charges frequently made against followers of Christ is that the church is sexist and homophobic. While there are some who this may be true of, how would you respond to the charge that the Bible teaches this? Due Friday midnight.
Monday, January 31, 2011
Sociology
Respond to this statement: It is in the states best interest to be more involved in parenting, even to the point of controlling what is taught in the home.
Remember, answer my question by telling me where to find your blog. Due Monday January 31st by midnight.
Remember, answer my question by telling me where to find your blog. Due Monday January 31st by midnight.
I think the state should not be involved with parenting someone's children and teaching them what the government wants them to learn. It is called parenting for a reason. Only parents should teach their kids morals and what is right. I mean if the government controlled this aspect of people's lives, the parents beliefs might not be the same as the state's. This would utterly cause conflict between parents and the state leading to an uproar. However, I think the state should control abusive parenting. If parents are torturing their child, the state should definitely step in and put a stop to it. They just should not go so far that they must parent the kids for the parents. Also, what if the parents are teaching their children something the state does not want them to know? Would it be illegal to pass on your wisdom and knowledge to your own kids? I think maybe the state's intention is good but ultimately this idea of parenting through the government should not be done.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)